Pakistan Sept. 2011 – The Agency (CIA) Has Declared An Internal Intelligence War On ISI.

This Mail is from september 2011 and it is about the CIA and the ISI (Pakistan military Intelligence Agency = Inter-Services Intelligence) in Pakistan and it is about the opressing power of the USA in that country. Stratfor Member comments on this Insight View are like: “I find it more interesting that the Agency has declared an internal intelligence war on ISI” and more on that below on the EMail: “Nobody is trusted.” furthermore they say the “CIA” is using “Moscow Rules.” against Pakistan and the ISI.

“The Agency is operating against Pakistan with Moscow Rules.

ISI is an enemy combatant.

The EMail comes from a “STRATFOR’s Pakistani sources” the source said: “I am getting the sense that the United States has decided to coerce Pakistan into compliance.” …, further it goes “If it continues on its current path then the U.S. could escalate matters further and engage in fixed wing airstrikes against militant assets in North Waziristan….”the main Haqqani facility is next door to the Pak army divisional command in Miramshah.” The source call this a “collateral damage”…”So in addition to collateral damage given the densely populated area a U.S. assault on the facility could kill many Pak army personnel.”

you can read the full EMAil the following lines:

Re: INSIGHT – U.S./PAKISTAN – Behind the escalation ***PROTECT SOURCE& INTEL***

Date 2011-09-28 15:12:30
From burton@stratfor.com
To sean.noonan@stratfor.com
secure@stratfor.com
Others MessageId:
InReplyTo: 1233806656-1317215394-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-528774114-@b28.c15.bise6.blackberry

Text

Smoking gun, Libya levels after La Belle Disco bombing.

I find it more interesting that the Agency has declared an internal
intelligence war on ISI.

Nobody is trusted.

On 9/28/2011 8:09 AM, Sean Noonan wrote:

I wonder how much signals intercept the US has to show the Paks
lying…….

———————————————————————-

From: Fred Burton
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 08:05:26 -0500 (CDT)
To: Kamran Bokhari
Cc:
Subject: Re: INSIGHT – U.S./PAKISTAN – Behind the escalation ***PROTECT
SOURCE & INTEL***
The ISI-CIA battles have moved into a freezing Cold War. Temperature
has dropped significantly.

The Agency is operating against Pakistan with Moscow Rules.

ISI is an enemy combatant.

On 9/27/2011 8:47 PM, Kamran Bokhari wrote:

SOURCE: PK00
ATTRIBUTION: STRATFOR’s Pakistani sources
SOURCE DESCRIPTION: Pak ambo to DC
PUBLICATION: No
SOURCE RELIABILITY: A
ITEM CREDIBILITY: B/C
SPECIAL HANDLING: Not Applicable
SOURCE HANDLER: Kamran

DC has told Islamabad. Help us reconcile with those under your
influence. As for those that are not under your control, either you
take em out or let us do so. The Haqqanis are not entirely under
Pakistani control. They do a lot of independent stuff.

There was a conversation that Islamabad facilitated in the UAE between
DC and the Haqqanis but then these guys turned around and engaged in a
series of attacks. But the Pakistanis aren’t willing to take action
against them. Spoke with Mullen who told me he has been lied to by his
Pak counterparts.

On the Pakistani side, the problem is that they deeply mistrust the
Americans and suspect that the U.S. is going behind its back and
cutting its own deals with the insurgents. Look at how Tayyeb Agha is
missing after the revelations that the U.S. was dealing with him to
reach Mullah Omar. I am getting the sense that the United States has
decided to coerce Pakistan into compliance.

Islamabad still has some time to help de-escalate matters but not a
whole lot. If it continues on its current path then the U.S. could
escalate matters further and engage in fixed wing airstrikes against
militant assets in North Waziristan. The problem has been that the
main Haqqani facility is next door to the Pak army divisional command
in Miramshah.

So in addition to collateral damage given the densely populated area a
U.S. assault on the facility could kill many Pak army personnel. There
is a growing U.S. view that it can always come back to working with
Pakistan. But for now it may need to get tough to shape behavior.

Related Links:
http://wikileaks.org/gifiles/docs/284258_re-insight-u-s-pakistan-behind-the-escalation-protect-source.html

WikiLeaks Forum:
http://www.wikileaks-forum.com/index.php/topic,17765.0.html

INSIGHT – PAKISTAN – Key 3-star on the tensions with the U.S. – PK7 *******PROTECT SOURCE*******

The following EMail shows you a conflict between Pakistan Forces and US Troops. the EMail is dated on 10/5/10 12:23PM and comes from a Newly promoted Lt-Gen and appointed head of the 1st Corps.Used to run the Frontier Corps before that. He is Talking about a case of friendly fire and he gives a view on the US Army work. He claims that the Army has make several mistakes and started a friendly fire situation:

“They picked up an Afghan source who deliberately mislead them into engaging
our post. The enquiry reveals that the US pilots having lived in the
area for 11 months did not even know the geography and had not marked
their maps. They did not use the instruments that we had put into place
for coordination i.e. liaison officers, joint border coordination cell
or the video conferencing…..”it was a case of friendly fire (it was
gross incompetence and total lack of concern), This has no impact (
everyday there is a squeal form some quarter or another). I want a
public apology…”

Please read here the Full Stratfor EMail.

http://www.wikileaks-forum.com/index.php/topic,17641.0.html

http://wikileaks.org/gifiles/releasedate/2013-02-21-00-insight-pakistan-key-3-star-on-the-tensions.html

Date	2010-10-05 19:33:51
From	michael.wilson@stratfor.com
To	secure@stratfor.com
Others	MessageId: <4CAB617F.4010109@stratfor.com> InReplyTo: 4CAB5F28.8020209@stratfor.com
Text
“They did not use the instruments that we had put into place for coordination i.e. liaison officers, joint border coordination cell or the video conferencing.”The seems to go along with the reports that US was going it alone without the pakistanis when targetting haqqani network. And this is what happens when you do that. ……..I almost have to wonder if the Pakistanis, faced with US forces going on there own to target Haqqani, facilitated this afghan source because they wante to show the US that bad things happen when US tries to go alone On 10/5/10 12:23 PM, Kamran Bokhari wrote: CODE: PK7 PUBLICATION: Analysis DESCRIPTION: Newly promoted Lt-Gen and appointed head of the 1st Corps. Used to run the Frontier Corps until last week. ATTRIBUTION: STRATFOR sources in Pakistan SOURCE RELIABILITY: A ITEM CREDIBILITY: 1 SPECIAL HANDLING: Not Applicable DISTRIBUTION: Analysts HANDLER: Kamran Kamran, good to hear from you. Thank you for your kind sentiments. I have taken over 1 Corps which is transitioning into Central Command for the Pak Army i.e. it shall coordinate operations for 30 and 11 Corps while maintaining 1 Corps and 19 Division as well as the FC as direct command troops. Its not there yet and will take a while before it really completes the transformation. The killing of the troops was based on typical arrogance and ignorance that is a trait of the US Army. They picked up an Afghan source who deliberately mislead them into engaging our post. The enquiry reveals that the US pilots having lived in the area for 11 months did not even know the geography and had not marked their maps. They did not use the instruments that we had put into place for coordination i.e. liaison officers, joint border coordination cell or the video conferencing. As such my response was swift, serious and conclusive. The ball is in their court; the FC cannot be treated like this and I had told them, no drones or cross border activity in my AOR since I am clear what to do. You can use this information but please do not quote me since it will be a breach of institutional ethics. You shall hear a mix of confused statements, i.e. we are looking for alternative routes ( I know nothing can support operations as this route so that is a lot of bull), that the road will open soon, (it will only open when we are satisfied), it was a case of friendly fire (it was gross incompetence and total lack of concern), This has no impact ( everyday there is a squeal form some quarter or another). I want a public apology, compensation for the families of the shaheeds and wounded, new rules of engagement, punishment for the offenders, definition of a no fly zone parallel to the border. Take care and watch the fun. — Michael Wilson Senior Watch Officer, STRATFOR Office: (512) 744 4300 ex. 4112 Email: michael.wilson@stratfor.com